The singer Blondie
(aka Debbie Harry) enjoyed a hit in the 70s with her song “Hanging On The
Telephone” about a girl desperately wanting to speak to her (we assume)
boyfriend. At times, it can feel like
this when we call “Customer Service” or the “Hotline” of a business only to be
greeted by an automated answering system.
From there, the experience goes downhill, except in a very few cases.
Humans are naturally social animals and don’t take easily to
dealing with automated systems. This is
especially true when someone is ringing to make a complaint or to obtain an
answer to an urgent question. Stress
levels are already high in these situations and to be put on “hold” whilst bland
music is played and we’re assured that “your call is important to us” does not
help when we finally get through to a human being. In worst-case scenarios, the latter goes
through a checklist of proof-of-identity questions (increasing stress levels
even more) before putting us on hold (again) to contact the “right” agent to
transfer us to. The “right” agent then
asks for the same information that we just gave the previous one…
Before you ask, yes, I’ve been in this situation.
The telephone is such an integral part of our daily lives. We think so little about how much we
accomplish through a simple voice interaction, that when we encounter a
situation where things don't work out, we automatically go into “fight or
flight” mode. We’re not getting what we
want and our reaction only risks making the situation worse.
That’s what happens on the caller’s side. As for the
receiver, the usual problem is that it’s “expensive” to have too many “real
people” dedicated to answering phones all the time. Automated answering systems are designed (in theory)
to sort callers out by need and then direct them to the appropriate agent. I suspect (without any real evidence) that
well over 95% of calls can be handled this way.
Even if it were 99%, that still leaves 1% not handled correctly. If our business receives 1,000 calls/day, 10
callers won’t be happy. Over a week,
that’s 50 callers (assuming we work Monday-Friday only).
50 unhappy callers/day (or 2,600/year) can do an awful lot
of damage to our reputation over social media these days… Do we really want that many people
criticising our business out there in the face of competition? Excuses such as “Well, we handle 99% of calls
successfully” tend to fall on deaf ears in these situations. It’s the 1% who are doing the damage.
The solution?
Ideally, have lots of well-informed staff to take calls. Reality check: this is expensive. Outsourcing is another possibility, but we
hear horror stories of “Call Centres” all over the world and their poor
handling of customers.
Ideally, we need to eliminate one of the main reasons for
calls: complaints. If the product or
service doesn't do “what it says on the tin”, people complain. If it does, they don’t. There will always be a few problems, but what
luxury to be able to dedicate call centre staff to selling more perfect product
rather than sorting out problems.
We also need to ask where else we could eliminate the need
for follow-up calls. If we rely on this
to sell other services, then we still need people.
In all, I’d rather have a product that worked as described,
rather than a “service hotline” that leaves me literally “hanging on the
telephone”.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home