Thursday 28 June 2012

Making It Happen


I see more and more recruitment adverts for people with experience in “project management” which tells me one thing – this is going to be more a part of management in the future as change becomes ever more prevalent and companies adapt to a faster pace. 

I’ve managed projects myself, and know others who are deeply knowledgeable in this art (or is it a science?), but what I’ve seen in my time is that you need to: 

Ask “Why Are We Doing This”?
Usually, projects have a reason – to improve efficiency, raise quality, increase revenues or profitability, introduce a new system, or any other number of purposes.  Make sure you know why you’re embarking on this adventure. 

Define the “Owner”:
Who owns the project (i.e. wants it done)?  This will usually be a head of department, function or company.  Can they make things happen if momentum is lost? 

Define The Objective:
How will you get there if you don’t know what the end result looks like and when it needs to be in place?  This is sometimes known as an overall specification and needs to be set firmly, but allow for unforeseen events.  I’ve seen cases where people jumped in without really asking “what do we want this to look like in the end?” and ended up “starting over”, going over budget, or both.  

Refine The Objective – Deliverables:
What is actually needed to make sure that the objective is achieved?  This could be premises, people, processes, systems, changes in the way the business does things - any number of items which all need to fit together by a certain time.   

Delivering the Deliverables:
What needs to happen to deliver each part of the project?  Break it down into steps (Post-It notes are great for this!).  Starting at the end and working backwards is the best way to do this. 

Allocate Timelines:
How long will each of the above take?  What resources are needed (people, systems, cash, equipment)?  Are they available?  How will you get them?  Do you need to hire in extra staff, plant/machinery?  How much will it cost?  This gives you your budget for the project. 

Establish Dependencies:
Does anything depend on something else happening first, or can it run “in parallel”?  If something needs to end before something else can start, how do you make sure that things proceed according to plan?  The “Critical Path” consists of the deliverables, targets or steps that must be delivered or met before others can begin.  Any one of these can derail the whole project. 

Contingency Planning:
What could go wrong?  How will you put it right?  What “early warning systems” can you put in place to tell you that you may have a problem before it becomes a crisis? 

Allocate Budget:
Everything costs time, money and effort.  How much will this be?  Will it all be worth the end result?  Sometimes, the cost outweighs the benefits and that’s a good reason not to proceed.  Allow room for “unforeseen expenses”.  Too many projects now come in over budget and behind schedule because of poor planning in the first place.

Allocate Responsibilities:
Who will do what and by when? Are they clear on what they have to do?   Do they have the tools and resources?  What do they do if something goes wrong? How do they report progress? Does everyone involved know who's doing what?

Get Support:
Get support – from management above (approval), those at the same level as you (agreement) and from those who report to you or are junior to you (acceptance).  This is where many projects founder due to lack of support or commitment from whichever level. 

And Finally...:
Projects don’t manage themselves.  Review progress regularly – not only of what has happened, but what is happening and what is due to happen.  How will you track progress?  What meetings will you hold, with whom and when?  What information will you need to track progress?  Who will deliver it, how and when?  Who will help make things happen if delays occur?  How will you measure success?  Establish an “early warning system” to alert you of potential problems before they become disasters so that you can allocate extra resources.


I have spent more than half my life working in different world markets from the most developed to “emerging” economies. With more than 20 years in the world financial services industry running different service, operations and lending businesses, I started my own Performance Management Consultancy and work with individuals, small businesses, charities, quoted companies and academic institutions across the world. An international speaker, trainer, author and fund-raiser, I can be contacted by email . My website provides a full picture of my portfolio of services.

Labels: , ,

Thursday 21 June 2012

How Well Do You Manage Your Knowledge?


I’ve been talking about how to protect information over the last month.  Information is converted by businesses into knowledge and if your business doesn’t have one yet, it’s time to think about your Knowledge Management Strategy. 

Managing knowledge for me means acquiring, consolidating, storing, updating and sharing knowledge with those who need it when they need it to remain competitive and profitable.  To use a simple example, when the price of a product changes, the stock room, sales staff, cash desk staff, accounts department and customer need to know.  If there’s a change in rules, everyone may need to know. 

A number of businesses thought in the past that knowledge simply meant storing information and ended up buying expensive software (and were not actively disabused of this by the software vendors).  As a result, they spent large sums of money on what turned out to be next to useless systems, or systems that didn’t do the job needed. 

A Knowledge Management strategy should be based around two concepts: serving customers and beating the competition.  In Verna Allee’s words, “Knowledge Management means attending to [the behaviours and] processes for creating, sustaining, applying, sharing and renewing knowledge to enhance organisational performance and create value”.  Equally, it is about ensuring that there is an environment where people are encouraged to innovate, share, learn and use knowledge for the benefit of the business and the people who work for it (Mathew Parsons).  Contrast this with those who take the view that knowledge is power and hold it to themselves. 

The business should ask the following questions: 

  • How does the business currently define Knowledge Management?
  • What knowledge or information does the business/department/team need to operate effectively? 
  • How is this information/knowledge gathered or acquired?
  • How is this information/knowledge stored?
  • How is it shared?
  • How easy is it for the people who need it to get it when they need it?
  • What can you do to encourage sharing and collaboration? 
  • How can you safeguard it? 
Once you have the answers to these questions, you can start to plan how you carry out a proper Knowledge Management strategy. 

When it comes to technology, remember Matthew Parsons’ comments: “Technology has a role to play in terms of connecting people, storing and providing access to information and knowledge and providing tools for knowledge workers”.  However, on its own, it is not the solution to the problem.  Businesses leverage knowledge through networks of people who collaborate and cooperate, not through networks of technology (the latter is just a delivery mechanism for the human element). 

People use knowledge if it helps solve a business problem – in other words, knowledge is subject to being “pulled” rather than “pushed”.  Simply put, if the knowledge is needed, it should be supplied.  It should not be supplied with the idea that someone will find a need.  When you ask what knowledge your business needs, the best people to tell you this are those who deal daily with customers, suppliers, regulators.  It should be clear by now that knowledge management is about human behaviour and interactions, rather than about storage and IT.  The latter is merely an enabler.


I have spent more than half my life working in different world markets from the most developed to “emerging” economies. With more than 20 years in the world financial services industry running different service, operations and lending businesses, I started my own Performance Management Consultancy and work with individuals, small businesses, charities, quoted companies and academic institutions across the world. An international speaker, trainer, author and fund-raiser, I can be contacted by email . My website provides a full picture of my portfolio of services.

Labels: , ,

Thursday 14 June 2012

Merger Meltdown – Who’s running The Business?

Everyone has their own views on what makes for a successful merger.  My own opinion is that it starts with good quality due diligence – checking out the potential partner.  Eric Daniels (Chief Executive of Lloyds TSB) is quoted as saying that they carried out 3-5 times less due diligence than they would normally have done on HBOS.  This resulted in Lloyds being forced to take GBP17billion of government capital, announcing write-downs of GBP11billion as a result of their takeover of HBOS, and prompting a drastic fall in their share price.  There is speculation that Lloyds were asked to step up to the plate – but at what cost to the UK financial market, already reeling from the credit crunch?

Assuming that due diligence is positive, the next step is persuading stakeholders of the wisdom of the move.  Shareholders, staff, customers, unions, regulators, governments, competition authorities amongst others all have to be convinced that this will be a good thing.  Will it result in added value all round?  The added value may be a stronger business (or a rescued one).  Expect staff and customer losses – there will be those who cannot work with the new regime.

Assuming that the above works, management need to set priorities (most of these will, hopefully, have surfaced with the due diligence).  They need to think of, amongst others, the strategy for the new organisation, systems, people, products/business lines, customers, fixed assets, corporate identity, financial reporting, regulatory and legal filings. 

Ideally, there will be a separate merger team reporting to the new Board of Directors.  Team members should be drawn from both sides and should have intimate knowledge of their own organisation.  It is best if they are completely removed from their “day jobs” to avoid distraction.  This will not always be possible, but it will at least mean that senior management at the higher levels are not distracted by having to continue running their own business as well.  Yes, it will cost more, but the longer-term benefits may outweigh this, and remember, you have more staff available.  The merger team should also have the ability to co-opt members as needed for varying periods of time if this can be done.  Don’t forget your legal advisers and audit firm – they can help.

You need to work out how much it’s going to cost to set things up for the newly-merged business (again, this should have surfaced with the due diligence).  What legal, regulatory, financial costs will there be?  Will there be redundancy costs once the businesses are merged?  How will all of this be financed?

In the meantime, “business as usual” must continue.  There will still be customers to serve. Staff morale will be critical at this time.  The best way to keep customers, staff and other stakeholders (e.g. shareholders, unions, banks, regulators) on side is to issue regular updates on progress – so gear up your Communications Department (or put someone in charge of this). 

Staff will be particularly concerned over job security and some unpleasant decisions will have to be made.  Make it clear what will happen and when, and be sensitive.  Staff will have knowledge of systems, customers, processes and networks of others who help them deliver the customer experience.  Manage this badly, and you destroy value.  There may also be trade unions to work with.  Remember, uncertainty breeds fear.

Any merger means change and uncertainty, but good management minimises potential damage and maintains stakeholder loyalty.  The critical steps are: good due diligence at the outset, a separate merger team reporting directly to the Board of Directors, regular communication to all stakeholders and involvement of the line when needed.  The merger process needs to happen alongside “business as usual” even if this implies additional costs at the outset.


I have spent more than half my life working in different world markets from the most developed to “emerging” economies. With more than 20 years in the world financial services industry running different service, operations and lending businesses, I started my own Performance Management Consultancy and work with individuals, small businesses, charities, quoted companies and academic institutions across the world. An international speaker, trainer, author and fund-raiser, I can be contacted by email . My website provides a full picture of my portfolio of services.


Labels: ,