Thursday 24 July 2014

Make That Call Count

Yesterday I hung up on a salesperson who called me.  

I didn’t even find out what they wanted to sell or if they wanted something else from me.  I didn’t give them the chance.  They launched into what sounded like a prepared script, which used the words “Our company” (and then named the company) three times in the first minute.

The caller made several critical mistakes:
  • They didn’t do any research on their target to find out if I was interested in their service (whatever it was);
  • They didn’t check if this was a good time to call (and that I would therefore be receptive);
  • They made no attempt to establish a relationship;
  • They made the call about their company rather than about mine.
All this became clear within the first 30 seconds of the call.  I could barely get them to repeat who they were or the name of their company before they launched into their speech.

So down went the phone.  After all, why should I let someone take time out of my life, which I’ll never get back?  Better not to waste their time listening to an interminable sales speech only to then say “Sorry, I’m not interested.”  Better to hang up and let them get on to the next “target”.

What could they have done better?  Here are some suggestions:
  • Research your intended target - there’s usually some kind of information on the internet - can they use your service?
  • When making contact, check if this is a good time to call (and that the person receiving the call will therefore be more receptive);
  • Establish a relationship - ask questions about the target company and its problems based on whatever information you’ve gathered; 
  • Make the call about the company you’re calling rather than about yours.
Of course, this takes time, and the person you’re calling may not have much.  Your goal is to get them to allow you to send them some more information or (better) to secure a face-to-face meeting.  You then terminate the call having established a positive relationship and having opened the door a little more.



I have spent more than half my life delivering change in different world markets from the most developed to “emerging” economies. With more than 20 years in the world financial services industry running different service, operations and lending businesses, I started my own Performance Management Consultancy to offer solutions for improving performance, productivity and risk management.  I work with individuals, small businesses, charities, quoted companies and academic institutions across the world. An international speaker, trainer, author and fund-raiser, I can be contacted by email . My website provides a full picture of my portfolio of services.  For strategic questions that you should be asking yourself, follow me at @wkm610.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday 9 July 2014

What IS Leadership?

This is one of the first questions that management trainees can be asked at the start of their training.  What usually follows is an exercise on what they consider makes a “good leader”.

Some claim that leaders are born and that you can’t make a leader through training. 

I’ve seen plenty of articles and comments on “leadership”, all of which stress different aspects (I even wrote a recent blog on leaders’ communication skills).  The Royal Military College, Sandhurst, has studied leadership extensively (with good reason) and business schools dedicate modules to teaching their students to be “leaders”.

What is clear is that, whilst we all think that we can identify the characteristics of a “good leader”, noone has an all-encompassing definition.  Equally, people disagree on whether leaders are “born” or can be “made” (given the right training).  Basically, no one knows what makes a leader, or why some people become leaders in certain situations.

One great question asked recently was “Is leadership a position or action?”  Pause for thought here - what do YOU think?  In my view, people are elected as leaders because of the way people see them behave.  They are then appointed into the position of leader.

Different people may be more or less effective leaders at different times.  Winston Churchill was the right man for Britain in WWII, but was not so successful post-war.  Equally, a company in a “Turnaround” situation requires a very different kind of person as the CEO compared with one in a “Sustaining Business” mode. Boards of Directors sometimes fail to appreciate this when selecting a new CEO.

What remains clear is that there are people to whom others naturally turn for “leadership”.  The question to ask is what makes people turn to one person instead of another (particularly if the person to whom they turn isn’t necessarily as knowledgeable” as the first).

In the past, the right to lead was granted by birth (kings and queens and the aristocracy).  This persisted more or less until the end of the Second World War in England, and is still the case in certain countries where monarchs rule with greater or lesser degrees of benevolence.  This is leadership by “birth” or inheritance.  The more popular way of becoming a leader is by “acclamation” or the vote of those who desire to be led.  The democratic process in many countries where people elect a leader illustrates this.

Similarly, smaller and less formal groups of people find themselves agreeing to follow a particular person as leader as a “natural process”.  The person chosen may not even have been aware that they displayed the qualities that that group considered desirable until they were chosen.

In some cases, it’s almost easier to say what doesn’t make for a leader.  Stories abound of those who don’t listen or care, who are arrogant, who don’t “set an example” or who show no interest in others.  Taking these could well point us to what does make a leader

The Royal Military College at Sandhurst is one of the leading leadership development institutions and has found that what most leaders have in common (apart from certain characteristics) is the ability to balance three critical elements:
  • Task
  • Team
  • Individual

Leadership is about getting things done through others.  The goal to be achieved is the task.  The group doing it is the team.  Teams are made up of individuals.  Those who fail to grasp significance of all three elements are unlikely to succeed as leaders. 


 I have spent more than half my life delivering change in different world markets from the most developed to “emerging” economies. With more than 20 years in the world financial services industry running different service, operations and lending businesses, I started my own Performance Management Consultancy to offer solutions for improving performance, productivity and risk management.  I work with individuals, small businesses, charities, quoted companies and academic institutions across the world. An international speaker, trainer, author and fund-raiser, I can be contacted by email . My website provides a full picture of my portfolio of services.  For strategic questions that you should be asking yourself, follow me at @wkm610.

Labels: , ,