Tuesday 25 June 2013

Dealing With “Difficult” Customers

Being in customer service positions, I have dealt with my share of “difficult” customers.  How you handle them can be the difference between turning them into loyal advocates or into a never-ending problem. 

Just to make it clear, I hate it when I have to deal with “difficult” customers (and I suspect most service staff do).  Happily, most people are pleasant to deal with.

The first thing to recognise when you find yourself dealing with a “difficult” person is that the human brain is naturally “wired” to produce a “fight/flight” response when faced with a threat.  This comes from when life was more dangerous and, when meeting a wild beast, humans either fought it off or killed it (“fight”) or ran away (“flight”).  Nowadays, the response is more likely to be aggression and stubbornness (“fight”) or “giving in” (“flight”). 

Translated into the situation of dealing with a difficult customer, the usual response is either to defend one’s position or give in.  Interestingly, when dealing with a “difficult” person, they will be experiencing the same.  So if you have both sides determined to “fight” (as often happens), you have a problem… 

This doesn’t mean that you should “give in”, but it does mean that you need to understand why the customer may be taking the stance that they are. 

Great service takes two.  It’s reasonable for customers to expect the staff serving them to be: 

·         Knowledgeable;
·         Courteous;
·         “Professional” (e.g. not to deceive or lie, keep promises, etc). 

Customers may be “difficult” for two main reasons: 

1.      They have a genuine complaint;
2.      They find that being “difficult” (even when it’s not justified) gets them what they want. 

In the first case: 

·         Find out why they’re upset (ask questions);
·         Apologise if the error is the business’ fault;
·         Explain how/why it happened in simple terms (especially if the customer did something to contribute to the problem);
·         Fix it – fast;
·         Make sure it won’t happen again (this may involve a lot of work, e.g. retraining, etc). 

Now let’s deal with the second case.  In this situation: 

·         Ask yourself why the customer is taking this attitude - is it because your organisation has given them a reason in the past?
·         If it’s due to bad past experiences, re-build their trust in “the system”;
·         If it’s because they feel they’ll get their way, no matter what the situation, lay down the rules under which you’ll deal with them (get your supervisor to help, if necessary). 

Remember to depersonalise any offending behaviour(s).  Rather than saying “I don’t like the way you…” try: “We require our staff to behave in a way that customers find respectful, courteous and professional and expect the same in return.  If customers can’t or won’t co-operate, then it’s in their best interests to look for this product/service elsewhere.” Just be sure that your organisation isn’t the cause of the problem, be prepared to carry this out and to deal with any negative PR that arises. 

Every organisation has the right to refuse to do business with a customer if they are persistently unpleasant to deal with for no good reason.  There are people who take the view that, unless they’re openly rude and/or aggressive, they won’t get what they want.  To an extent this works, but in the end, they get their come-uppance.  I’ve had to deal with such people in the past and will in the future.  Most often, a clear laying-down of the terms on which you’re prepared to do business is enough to make them think (particularly if they need your product/service).  If they go elsewhere, they’re no longer your problem. 

Customers are the reason that we all have jobs, and must be accorded the consideration and professionalism that we would expect ourselves.  If we fail due to a lapse on our part, they have every right to be upset and it is our duty to solve the problem as fast as possible with minimal (or no) loss to the customer and to rebuild their trust. 

 

I have spent more than half my life delivering change in different world markets from the most developed to “emerging” economies. With more than 20 years in the world financial services industry running different service, operations and lending businesses, I started my own Performance Management Consultancy to offer solutions for improving performance, productivity and risk management.  I work with individuals, small businesses, charities, quoted companies and academic institutions across the world. An international speaker, trainer, author and fund-raiser, I can be contacted by email . My website provides a full picture of my portfolio of services.  For strategic questions that you should be asking yourself, follow me at @wkm610.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday 19 June 2013

The Agony of Expectations

When I talk to clients about “Customer Service” one of the first things we discuss are the differences that most have seen between expectations and experience.  

Every customer, the experts will tell you, has needs and it is up to us to fulfil those needs.  They teach us to ask questions to determine those needs, to listen actively to verbal and non-verbal cues, and to then produce the solution to meet them.

Few people take the time to realise that what matters most to a customer is the expectation that they have that their need(s) will be satisfied in a particular way.  This is the question that they often fail to ask or address.  Yes, the product/service may be delivered, but the customer remains unsatisfied.  Why?  Because their expectations either weren’t met at all, or were met only to a small degree. 

Is it reasonable to understand and meet (if not exceed) expectations?  The answer to that is simple – what are your reputation and business worth?  In some cases, expectations may be low because that’s what people have been taught.  Budget airlines, for example, are notorious for late arrivals/departures, poor service (some more than others) high “hidden charges” for anything from printing a boarding pass to checking in a suitcase).  Their logic is: “What do you expect for such a low price?”. 

Where expectations are low and experience is correspondingly low, then no problem.  Where there’s a disconnect between expectations and experience, you have a potential problem or delight.

The table below gives an idea of what I’m talking about (I call it the Expectations vs Experience Grid): 

Expectations
Experience
Customer Reaction
Result
Low
Low
Stoicism
You get what you pay for
High
Low
Disgust
Complaints
Low
High
Delight
Repeat business, but…
High
High
Satisfaction
This what we expect now…

Expressed graphically, it looks like this: 

Experience
High
Delight
2
Low Expectations
High Experience
3
High Expectations
High Experience
Satisfaction
 
Stoicism
1
Low Expectations
Low Experience
4
High Expectations
Low Experience
Disgust
 
Low
 
High
 
 
Expectations
 

Given a choice, you want customers to be in the top half and (better still) in the upper left quadrant (quadrant 2).  Where you don’t want them to be is the bottom right (quadrant 4)…  If they end up in the bottom left, well, at least you didn’t lose out, and what did you expect for the price anyway? 

Next: where do you want yourself and/or your organisation to be seen on the grid?  Ideally in quadrant 2, and most coaches tell you to “under-promise but “over-deliver”.  Trouble is, customers aren’t that stupid.  Equally, once you perform in quadrant 2, they’ll come to expect it (moving you to quadrant 3).  Complaints arise when they expect quadrant 3, but get quadrant 4. 

Many organisations build up high expectations without realising it.  It can be as simple as saying “I’ll call you this afternoon”.   In some countries in which I’ve lived and worked, people have said “Set your expectations low, and you’ll never be disappointed”.  What people are talking about is “structuring expectations” – a phrase that you’ll hear often when it comes to service or sales.  Coaches will tell you to “structure a customer’s expectations” to ensure that they expect the quality of service they’re about to get (or even a lower quality) so that, when the quality is higher, they get a “pleasant surprise”.

For me, this is cynical manipulation amounting to lack of integrity.  By all means, be honest, but don’t mislead.  Once people realise what you’re doing, the bond of trust is broken and no matter what you do, they’ll have low expectations of low service (and treat you/your organisation accordingly).  Interestingly, the advertising industry gets away with this almost every day by claiming that a particular product will make you more attractive, fitter, happier or more desirable in some form or another. 

Does it?  Not often.
 

I have spent more than half my life delivering change in different world markets from the most developed to “emerging” economies. With more than 20 years in the world financial services industry running different service, operations and lending businesses, I started my own Performance Management Consultancy to offer solutions for improving performance, productivity and risk management.  I work with individuals, small businesses, charities, quoted companies and academic institutions across the world. An international speaker, trainer, author and fund-raiser, I can be contacted by email . My website provides a full picture of my portfolio of services.  For strategic questions that you should be asking yourself, follow me at @wkm610.

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday 11 June 2013

The Importance Of A Positive Recruitment Experience


I recently read a great article on how important it is to treat job applicants well.  How much do we really think about this, though?  Even in the current “buyers’ market” in the West, interviewers/recruiters may only think that the hiring company matters, and that they’re doing the candidate a favour by interviewing them.  Nothing could be further from the truth. 

The way you treat a candidate has significant repercussions.  Treat them right, future bright.  Treat them bad, make them mad.  So what can you do to make for a great recruitment experience?  Here’s what I think is absolutely critical: 

1.      Have a proper Job Description: potential candidates need to see immediately if they’re likely to meet your requirements or not.  It’s amazing how many “blue chip” companies still produce poorly written Job Descriptions, then wonder why they have so many applications. 

2.      Acknowledge applications promptly: preferably within 2 working days.  A number of employers now state that, if candidates don’t hear from them, they should assume that they haven’t made the “first cut”.  This is unprofessional and rude.  Candidates who have spent time on preparing their submission deserve a professional response. 

3.      Tell them what comes next: e.g. you need time to go through their application and when you’ll get back to them.  Don’t leave this for too long. 

4.      Get back when you say you will: nothing is worse than a broken promise to someone. 

5.      Be professional: at all times during the interview process, and make sure that this doesn’t “drag out”.  Know how many interviews it takes to reach a decision and explain this to candidates. 

6.      Don’t delay: if you find “the one”, make the offer quickly. 

7.      Let others down gracefully: you never know when you might be asking for business from them. 

What could be the results of a positive experience (including telling the candidate that they haven’t made it this time)? 

·         A Positive Place: … in the candidate’s mind.  OK, so they didn’t get the job, but if they were handled properly, professionally and with integrity, they will deal with you in future, and tell others about how “fair” you were. 

·         Increased Revenues/Profitability: candidates and their family and friends will still do business with you, what will that do to your bottom line? 

·         A Better Deal: candidates are more likely to treat the company favourably in future, should they be asked for business. 

What happens if you get this wrong?  To start with: 

·         Negative Reputational Impact: social media is here to stay and is accessible to anyone with a smartphone.  Treat a candidate badly and he/she can be FaceBooking or Tweeting to friends within minutes of leaving.  Don’t think they’ll hold back for fear of not being considered for the job – they’ve already rejected you as an employer and no longer care. 

·         Profitability: Candidates who have a bad experience are less likely to buy your product or service and will tell friends and family not to do so as well.  Depending on how “viral” the experience goes, expect to see a drop in revenues and/or profitability. 

·         When The Market Recovers…: people will be scrambling to fill new roles.  If you already have a “bad name”, what sort of candidate will you attract? 

·         He Who Laughs Last…: one day, you may be seeking business from a disappointed candidate.  Imagine your feelings after you pitch what you think is the perfect proposal, only to be told “Yes, I remember interviewing with you for a job X months/years ago.  If the way you treated me as a candidate is anything like the way you’ll treat me as a customer, the answer’s no!” 

Short-term thinking applied to long-term recruitment will only get you one thing – trouble.
 

I have spent more than half my life delivering change in different world markets from the most developed to “emerging” economies. With more than 20 years in the world financial services industry running different service, operations and lending businesses, I started my own Performance Management Consultancy and work with individuals, small businesses, charities, quoted companies and academic institutions across the world. An international speaker, trainer, author and fund-raiser, I can be contacted by email . My website provides a full picture of my portfolio of services.  For strategic questions that you should be asking yourself, follow me at @wkm610.

Labels: ,

Monday 3 June 2013

Overloading Your Customers

Providing a constant stream of updates and information by email, text or letter is a good thing, right? 
 
Maybe not…   Here’s an experience we’re having with my daughter’s school.  They’ve installed a new emailing system which lets them reach out to all parents by email instead of printing out hundreds of letters, flyers and information sheets.  This saves printing costs and is much more environmentally-friendly.  

So far, so good.  Unfortunately, what they’re doing now is sending emails for everything all the time.  To make things more interesting, if you have more than one child at the school, you get one email for each child, so someone with three children gets three messages – all the same.  

What the school hasn’t grasped is that:

·         Not all emails need to be sent “on the spot”;
·         Not all emails need to be sent to every parent;
·         Too many emails create “clutter” which those with a very full inbox may ignore or not see until it’s too late;
·         Too many emails mean that they may not be prioritised by those reading them;
·         Too many emails use system resources, increasing running costs. 

Now put this in a business context.  Everyone is busy and receives emails from different sources.  How do you make sure that they notice (and read) your email?   To start with:

·         Email only when necessary;
·         Make sure the email goes only to the people it’s meant to, rather than to your general distribution list.
·         Use electronic bulletin boards, weekly or even monthly updates which people can access in their own time. 

What’s the solution?  The school could: 

·         Target emails to whoever needs to act on them;
·         Create/maintain different distribution lists for sports teams, for example;
·         Respect that they don’t need to send out every notice immediately;
·         Encourage staff to plan ahead for distributing notices that aren’t time-sensitive;
·         Send out a weekly update with links to news items or notices on the school website which could even have a “latest news” page. 

Yes, it will take time, but if it means that your message is more meaningful and targeted, this is a good thing and shows that you and your business respect other peoples’ time.
 

I have spent more than half my life delivering change in different world markets from the most developed to “emerging” economies. With more than 20 years in the world financial services industry running different service, operations and lending businesses, I started my own Performance Management Consultancy and work with individuals, small businesses, charities, quoted companies and academic institutions across the world. An international speaker, trainer, author and fund-raiser, I can be contacted by email . My website provides a full picture of my portfolio of services.  For strategic questions that you should be asking yourself, follow me at @wkm610.

Labels: , , ,